MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4404319955 · doi:10.1080/0145935x.2024.2427927

Tracking a Decade of Development of Early Childhood Care and Education in Kazakhstan, 2006–2015

2024· article· en· W4404319955 on OpenAlexaff
Hakim Zainiddinov, Nazim Habibov, Alena Auchynnikava

Bibliographic record

VenueChild & Youth Services · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicPoverty, Education, and Child Welfare
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Windsor
Fundersnot available
KeywordsTracking (education)Early childhood educationEarly childhoodChild developmentEconomic growthMedicinePolitical sciencePsychologyDevelopmental psychologyPedagogyEconomics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The study employed data from the 2006, 2010–2011 and 2015 Multiple Indicator Cluster Surveys to assess the decade of early childhood care and education (ECCE) development in Kazakhstan. Enrollment grew from 15% to 60% but remained lower than the targeted rate of 75%. The effects of the wealth gradient and language disparities on enrollment were reduced significantly. Concurrently, regional disparities in enrollment increased during the reform period and the child’s age became a significant precursor of enrollment over time. Parents opted to enroll relatively older children to ECCE and this trend has been shown to become more prominent over time.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.645
Threshold uncertainty score0.998

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.275
Teacher spread0.266 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueChild & Youth ServicesSame topicPoverty, Education, and Child WelfareFrench-language works237,207