MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4404320149 · doi:10.5267/j.ccl.2024.10.004

Structural, electronic, and spectroscopic properties of oxadiazole isomers in the light of DFT computational study

2024· article· en· W4404320149 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Oumaima Oulhaj, Lamya Oubenmoussa, Hicham Essassaoui, Mohamed Bouha, Mohamed Mbarki

Bibliographic record

VenueCurrent Chemistry Letters · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMaterials Science
TopicNonlinear Optical Materials Research
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsChemistryOxadiazoleComputational chemistryDensity functional theoryElectronic structureCombinatorial chemistryOrganic chemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Oxadiazoles, a class of nitrogen-containing heterocycles, exhibit diverse applications in pharmaceuticals, industry, and other fields. This study employs Density Functional Theory (DFT) to investigate the structural, electronic, and spectroscopic properties of four oxadiazole isomers. The B3LYP functional and the 6-311G(d,p) basis set were used for calculations. Frontier orbital energies, energy gap, chemical reactivity descriptors, dipole moment, and thermodynamic properties were computed. Additionally, IR and UV spectra were analyzed. The results indicate significant variations in electronic and thermodynamic properties among the isomers. Isomer 4 demonstrated the highest stability and electrophilicity. The calculated IR and UV spectra were compared with available experimental and theoretical data. The study provides valuable insights into the structural and reactivity trends within the oxadiazole family, contributing to a deeper understanding of their potential applications.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.006
Threshold uncertainty score0.012

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.022
GPT teacher head0.299
Teacher spread0.277 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCurrent Chemistry LettersSame topicNonlinear Optical Materials ResearchFrench-language works237,207