MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4404322465 · doi:10.1016/j.wen.2024.11.002

A comprehensive review of effective parameters to improve the performance of the Savonius turbine using a computational model and comparison with practical results

2024· review· en· W4404322465 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueWater-Energy Nexus · 2024
Typereview
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicWind Energy Research and Development
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Ottawa
Fundersnot available
KeywordsTurbineComputational fluid dynamicsComputer scienceEnvironmental scienceEngineeringAerospace engineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

• Optimized Savonius turbines enhance efficiency for low-flow water conditions, addressing global energy needs. • Adjusting height-to-diameter ratio from 1.2 to 0.8 improves power coefficient from 0.33 to 0.38. • A 45° blade twist angle maximizes efficiency, with diminishing returns at higher angles. • Two-stage turbine with a 90° phase shift boosts power coefficient to 0.51. • Utilizing a 90° deflector angle significantly enhances turbine performance. • Validated CFD simulations using the MRF method and k-epsilon model ensure robust and reliable findings. • Study bridges theoretical research and real-world renewable energy applications. • Sets new performance benchmarks for Savonius turbine design and manufacturing standards. Amidst growing global concerns over climate change and escalating greenhouse gas emissions from fossil fuels, the pursuit of renewable energy sources has become critical. This study focuses on harnessing hydropower using Savonius turbines, which are known for their efficiency in generating energy at lower flow rates. However, the intrinsic low efficiency of these turbines necessitates precise optimization tailored to specific river or channel conditions. In this research, we optimized the performance of Savonius turbines by analyzing key parameters such as the height-to-diameter ratio, blade twist, and the integration of multi-stage configurations with deflectors. Our findings reveal significant efficiency improvements through strategic modifications. Specifically, by reducing the height-to-diameter ratio from 1.2 to 0.8 and maintaining a Tip Speed Ratio (TSR) of 0.6, the power coefficient increased by 15%, from 0.33 to 0.38. Further optimization was achieved by adjusting the blade twist angle, with an increase in power coefficient up to an optimal angle of 45°, beyond which efficiency declined. Implementing a two-stage turbine setup with a 90-degree phase difference between stages further improved the power coefficient to 0.51 at the same TSR. Additionally, the use of deflectors, particularly at a 90° angle, significantly boosted the power coefficient, highlighting their effectiveness in optimizing water flow impact on the turbine. This comprehensive study not only advances the understanding of Savonius turbine optimization but also contributes to broader renewable energy applications. The research offers critical insights into sustainable hydroelectric power generation, providing practical solutions to enhance turbine performance for real-world applications.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.167
Threshold uncertainty score0.661

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.043
GPT teacher head0.314
Teacher spread0.271 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it