MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4404325569 · doi:10.1201/9781003496724-24

Backstepping control based on neural network estimation

2024· book-chapter· en· W4404325569 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typebook-chapter
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAdvanced Sensor and Control Systems
Canadian institutionsConcordia University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBacksteppingEstimationArtificial neural networkComputer scienceControl (management)Artificial intelligenceNeuroscienceControl theory (sociology)PsychologyEngineeringAdaptive controlSystems engineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper is implementing a backstepping controller to a quadrotor that is subject to unknown disturbances and uncertainty in dynamics. Estimation and approximation of unkowns and uncertainties are performed by using Radial Base Function Neural Network (RBFNN). Along with a backstepping controller, they provide robustness to the robotic systemdespite of the presence od uncertainties. The RBFNN's output layer is utilized as an estimator then compensation eliminates the undesired effect occurs due to uncertainties. As a result, faster error convergence is achievable. A Lyapunov function was used to analyze the closed loop system, and Matlab/Simulink was used to evaluate the system performance. The demonstrated results prove the efficiency of the proposed approach.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.470
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.195
Teacher spread0.187 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicAdvanced Sensor and Control SystemsFrench-language works237,207