MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4404326032 · doi:10.1002/smll.202405511

Recent Developments in Glioblastoma‐On‐A‐Chip for Advanced Drug Screening Applications

2024· review· en· W4404326032 on OpenAlexaff
Surjendu Maity, Tamanna Bhuyan, Christopher M. Jewell, Satoru Kawakita, Saurabh Sharma, Huu Tuan Nguyen, Alireza Hassani Najafabadi, Menekşe Ermis, Natashya Falcone, Junjie Chen, Kalpana Mandal, Danial Khorsandi, Can Yilgor, Auveen Choroomi, Marvin Mecwan, Johnson V. John, Mohsen Akbari, Zhaohui Wang, Diogo Moniz‐Garcia, Alfredo Quiñones‐Hinojosa, Vadim Jucaud, Mehmet R. Dokmeci, Ali Khademhosseini

Bibliographic record

VenueSmall · 2024
Typereview
Languageen
FieldEngineering
Topic3D Printing in Biomedical Research
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Victoria
FundersNational Center for Advancing Translational SciencesNational Institute of Neurological Disorders and StrokeNational Institutes of Health
KeywordsGlioblastomaDrugMedicinePersonalized medicineBrain cancerOrgan-on-a-chipDrug deliveryCancerDrug developmentBrain tumorTumor microenvironmentCancer researchBioinformaticsNanotechnologyPharmacologyBiologyPathologyInternal medicineMaterials scienceMicrofluidics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Glioblastoma (GBM) is an aggressive form of cancer, comprising ≈80% of malignant brain tumors. However, there are no effective treatments for GBM due to its heterogeneity and the presence of the blood-brain barrier (BBB), which restricts the delivery of therapeutics to the brain. Despite in vitro models contributing to the understanding of GBM, conventional 2D models oversimplify the complex tumor microenvironment. Organ-on-a-chip (OoC) models have emerged as promising platforms that recapitulate human tissue physiology, enabling disease modeling, drug screening, and personalized medicine. There is a sudden increase in GBM-on-a-chip models that can significantly advance the knowledge of GBM etiology and revolutionize drug development by reducing animal testing and enhancing translation to the clinic. In this review, an overview of GBM-on-a-chip models and their applications is reported for drug screening and discussed current challenges and potential future directions for GBM-on-a-chip models.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.987
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.071
GPT teacher head0.365
Teacher spread0.295 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations20
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueSmallSame topic3D Printing in Biomedical ResearchFrench-language works237,207