MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4404328149 · doi:10.1139/tcsme-2024-0084

Improved adaptive genetic algorithm for dynamic multi-specification one-dimensional cutting problem

2024· article· en· W4404328149 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Li Liu, Zijin Liu, Xuefei Qian

Bibliographic record

VenueTransactions of the Canadian Society for Mechanical Engineering · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicOptimization and Packing Problems
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAlgorithmComputer scienceGenetic algorithmMathematical optimizationMathematics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Rebar is an essential material in the construction of bridges and houses. Rebar cutting is an important link in rebar processing, but it is usually completed by manual experience, which is not only time-consuming, but also causes serious waste and reduces the economic benefits. As the country vigorously promotes the green construction method, the traditional rebar cutting method is difficult to meet the development requirements. So dynamic multi-specification one-dimensional cutting problem is studied in this paper. A mathematical model aiming at the maximum utilization rate of raw material is established, and an improved adaptive genetic algorithm is proposed. Large-scale, small-scale, single-specification masterbatch and multi-specification masterbatch are selected for simulation experiments, respectively. The results show that the proposed algorithm can deal with both large- and small-scale multi-specification or single-specification masterbatch cutting problems. Moreover, the algorithm has good performance in solving accuracy and convergence speed, which verifies its feasibility, effectiveness, and stability. Finally, aiming at the problem of dynamic insertion of orders, one-dimensional cutting software is developed, rapid and real-time cutting of rebars is realized, and the utilization rate of building rebars is improved, which plays a positive role in promoting the high-quality development of construction industries such as bridges.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.013
Threshold uncertainty score0.025

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.016
GPT teacher head0.214
Teacher spread0.198 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueTransactions of the Canadian Society for Mechanical EngineeringSame topicOptimization and Packing ProblemsFrench-language works237,207