MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Russell and the Eliots [review of Carole Seymour-Jones, <i>Painted Shadow: a Life of Vivienne Eliot</i>]

2004· article· en· W44043293 on OpenAlexaffvenue
Kenneth Blackwell

Bibliographic record

VenueRussell the Journal of Bertrand Russell Studies · 2004
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicModernist Literature and Criticism
Canadian institutionsMcMaster University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsShadow (psychology)ArtArt historyEnvironmental ethicsPhilosophyPsychoanalysisPsychology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

 Reviews RUSSELL AND THE ELIOTS K B Carole Seymour-Jones. Painted Shadow: a Life of Vivienne Eliot. London: Constable , ; New York: Doubleday, . Pp. xxii + . £., . (hb); £., . (pb). arole Seymour-Jones makes the case for Vivien(ne) Eliot's silencing by the C"collusion" of her husband and Bertrand Russell. Whether there is any truth to this, she displays an astonishing grasp of daily events during the periods that the Eliots lived with Russell, with hardly a meeting or epistolary concern overlooked. Chapters – are fascinating. Russell met Vivien a day after Lawrence's rejection of him. He made Vivien personal gifts and even signed a lease with her. The two Eliots must have been a major thread, if not purpose, of Russell's life in –. This is her main contribution to Russell studies. She also claims that Russell had a "Satanic aspect", which is stressed in "Mr. Apollinax" (p. ; also , , ), accepting Monk's analysis of "Satan in the Suburbs" as autobiographical (pp. –). But she wrongly dates the poem as composed after the Eliots moved in with Russell (pp. , ) in September , whereas Eliot scholars place it at about the time that Eliot, and not merely the Channing-Cheetahs, called him "unbalanced" (Letters, : ). She also misidentifies Russell as the First Tempter ("atheism"; p. ) in Murder in the Cathedral. Eliot's notes show he thought of Russell as the Second (power). Although Seymour-Jones creates an overwhelming sense of pity for Vivien, it is not only for her worsening illness or ill-treatment but for the insight we gain into her literary side. Vivien assisted with such enterprises as The Criterion. Her papers are in the Bodleian, Oxford. They include what Seymour-Jones calls a sketch of Russell in Notebook  for a work called "Parties". As for her letters to him, Seymour-Jones states it as factual that Russell "destroyed them deliberately in an attempt to distance himself from her" (pp. , ) and "laid a false trail in his autobiography" (p. ). Aside from the fact that Vivien's side in the Russell Archives is incomplete, and probably very much so, there is no documentary evidence that Russell destroyed anybody's letters for that purpose. ...

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.787
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.002
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.020
GPT teacher head0.243
Teacher spread0.223 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2004
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueRussell the Journal of Bertrand Russell StudiesSame topicModernist Literature and CriticismFrench-language works237,207