Remote Assistance for Bone-Fractured Patients using Deep Learning Models
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Remote diagnosis enables healthcare professionals to evaluate and diagnose patients from a distance using telecommunication technologies, enhancing healthcare delivery by improving accessibility, especially for those in remote or underserved areas. One of the significant sustainability challenges in remote medical diagnostics is offering timely assistance to vulnerable groups like the elderly, disabled, mentally impaired individuals, and wounded military personnel in combat zones. This becomes particularly difficult in emergencies when rapid analysis of medical records is needed, especially if the data is stored on secure blockchain networks. The proposed work addresses these challenges by deploying a comprehensive framework for large-scale analysis, utilizing both document and image classification for dual validation. It integrates advanced techniques such as Inception V3, VGG-16, VGG-19, RESNET-50, and Densenet-201 for bone fracture detection, with Inception V3 achieving the highest accuracy of 95.1%. In addition, a Document Classification Analysis (DCA) method is proposed, which automatically classifies the severity of fractures. Object detection techniques are also introduced for detecting minor fractures using region-based image segmentation, ensuring precise diagnosis even for subtle injuries. This pioneering integration of technologies provides a holistic solution for remote medical diagnostics.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".