Patient-reported outcome measures for life participation in patients with chronic kidney disease: a systematic review
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Background: The symptoms, comorbidities and treatment burden associated with chronic kidney disease (CKD) can be debilitating and limit life participation in patients with CKD not requiring kidney replacement therapy (KRT). The aim of this study was to identify the characteristics, content and psychometric properties of patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) used to assess life participation in patients with CKD. Methods: We searched MEDLINE, Embase, PsycINFO and CINAHL from database inception to February 2023 for all studies that reported life participation in patients with CKD (stages 1-5 not requiring kidney replacement therapy). We analysed the characteristics, dimensions of life participation and psychometric properties of the measures. Results: From the 114 studies included, 20 (18%) were randomized trials, 3 (3%) were non-randomized trials and 91 (80%) were observational studies. Forty-one different measures were used to assess life participation, of which six (15%) were author-developed measures. Twelve (29%) measures assessed life participation specifically, while 29 (71%) measures assessed broader constructs such as quality of life, which included questions relevant to life participation. The 36-Item Short Form Health Survey (SF-36) and Kidney Disease Quality of Life Short Form (KDQOL-SF) were the most frequently used, in 39 (34%) and 24 (21%) studies, respectively. Many content domains for life participation were assessed, including physical activities (walking, running and sports), social activities, leisure activities, work or study and self-care. None of the measures for life participation were developed specifically for CKD. Four measures (EuroQol 5-dimension 3-level (EQ-5D-3L), Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy - Anemia, Short Form 6-dimension and Short-From 36-dimension (SF-36)) had validation data collected in patients with CKD. Conclusion: The measures for life participation used in patients with CKD vary in content, with few validated in the CKD population. There is a need for a validated measure to assess life participation in a meaningful and consistent way in all patients with CKD worldwide.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.013 | 0.067 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.007 | 0.008 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.007 | 0.009 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".