MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4404332734 · doi:10.1177/10668969241295687

Unconventional Histopathological Features With <i>KIAA1549::BRAF</i> Fusion in Advanced Prostatic Adenocarcinoma

2024· article· en· W4404332734 on OpenAlexaff
Anurag Sharma, Neha Khaitan, Roshan Bhattarai, Haya Homsi, Jesse K. McKenney, Yu‐Wei Cheng

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Journal of Surgical Pathology · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicProstate Cancer Treatment and Research
Canadian institutionsLondon Health Sciences CentreWestern University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPathologyMedicineProstateAdenocarcinomaProstate cancerCancerCancer researchInternal medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This report delineates an intriguing example of advanced prostatic adenocarcinoma displaying distinctive histopathological characteristics associated with a KIAA1549::BRAF fusion, a genomic anomaly predominantly identified in central nervous system tumors. A 66-year-old man, presenting with acute renal failure, exhibited metastatic disease involving pelvic soft tissue, bladder, liver, and bone. Histological examination revealed a markedly unconventional morphology within the prostate, characterized by infiltrative tumor sheets exhibiting abundant vacuolated cytoplasm, hyperchromatic nuclei, and irregular nuclear membranes, distinct from typical prostatic adenocarcinoma. Immunophenotyping confirmed NKX3.1 positivity and GATA3 negativity. Molecular analysis revealed the rare KIAA1549::BRAF fusion alongside pertinent mutations in phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase, phosphatase and tensin homolog, and tumor protein 53 genes. Despite diverse therapeutic interventions targeting mitogen-activated protein kinase signaling and subsequent clinical trial enrollment, disease progression remained relentless, culminating in the patient's demise within 4 years of diagnosis. This report highlights the exceptional histopathological presentation associated with KIAA1549::BRAF fusion in prostatic adenocarcinoma, emphasizing the need for a deeper comprehension of its implications on disease behavior and therapeutic responsiveness in similar instances.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Case report · Consensus signal: Case report
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.003

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.016
GPT teacher head0.327
Teacher spread0.312 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designCase report
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueInternational Journal of Surgical PathologySame topicProstate Cancer Treatment and ResearchFrench-language works237,207