Refining SARS-CoV-2 intra-host variation by leveraging large-scale sequencing data
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Understanding the evolution of viral genomes is essential for elucidating how viruses adapt and change over time. Analyzing intra-host single nucleotide variants (iSNVs) provides key insights into the mechanisms driving the emergence of new viral lineages, which are crucial for predicting and mitigating future viral threats. Despite the potential of next-generation sequencing (NGS) to capture these iSNVs, the process is fraught with challenges, particularly the risk of capturing sequencing artifacts that may result in false iSNVs. To tackle this issue, we developed a workflow designed to enhance the reliability of iSNV detection in large heterogeneous collections of NGS libraries. We use over 130,000 publicly available SARS-CoV-2 NGS libraries to show how our comprehensive workflow effectively distinguishes emerging viral mutations from sequencing errors. This approach incorporates rigorous bioinformatics protocols, stringent quality control metrics, and innovative usage of dimensionality reduction methods to generate representations of this high-dimensional dataset. We identified and mitigated batch effects linked to specific sequencing centers around the world and introduced quality control metrics that consider strand coverage imbalance, enhancing iSNV reliability. Additionally, we pioneer the application of the PHATE visualization approach to genomic data and introduce a methodology that quantifies how related groups of data points are within a two-dimensional space, enhancing our ability to explain clustering patterns based on their shared genetic characteristics. Our workflow sheds light on the complexities of viral genomic analysis with state-of-the-art sequencing technologies and advances the detection of accurate intra-host mutations, opening the door for an enhanced understanding of viral adaptation mechanisms.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.005 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".