MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

CHARACTERIZING AND MODELLING OCEAN AMBIENT NOISE USING INFRASOUND NETWORK AND MIDDLE ATMOSPHERIC MODELS

2018· article· en· W4404334740 on OpenAlexaff
Marine De Carlo, Alexis Le Pichon, Fabrice Ardhuin, Sven Peter Näsholm

Bibliographic record

VenueNNC RK Bulletin · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicSeismic Waves and Analysis
Canadian institutionsAtomic Energy (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsInfrasoundNoise (video)Environmental scienceAmbient noise levelGeologyMeteorologyAcousticsOceanographySound (geography)GeographyComputer sciencePhysicsArtificial intelligence

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Infrasound is one of the technologies of the International Monitoring System (IMS) supporting the verification regime of the Comprehensive Nuclear-Test-Ban Treaty (CTBT). In the frequency band of interest to detect atmospheric explosions, ambient noise may affect detection and particularly ocean noise referred to as microbaroms. Ocean wave interactions generate acoustic noise almost continuously which can obscure signals of interest in their frequency range. The detectability of such noise strongly depends on atmospheric conditions along the propagation paths. Using ocean wave action model developed by IFREMER and considering the effects of general middle-atmospheric products delivered by ECMWF in long-range propagation, microbarom amplitudes and direction of arrivals derived from various propagation models are compared with the observations. With this study, it is expected to enhance the characterization of the ocean-atmosphere coupling. In return, a better knowledge of microbarom sources would allow to better characterize explosive atmospheric events hidden in the ambient noise.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.055
Threshold uncertainty score0.109

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.028
GPT teacher head0.196
Teacher spread0.168 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2018
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueNNC RK BulletinSame topicSeismic Waves and AnalysisFrench-language works237,207