MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4404336928 · doi:10.61132/saturnus.v2i3.206

Audit Sistem Informasi Menggunakan Framework Cobit 5

2024· article· en· W4404336928 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueSaturnus · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBusiness, Management and Accounting
TopicDecision Support System Applications
Canadian institutionsKootenay Association for Science & Technology
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCOBITAuditComputer scienceBusinessInformation technologyAccountingOperating system

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The information systems currently used by PT Media Print need to be evaluated to ensure that they remain relevant, efficient and secure. In the competitive print media industry, it is important for companies to ensure that their information systems support business processes well and provide high-quality service to customers. This audit aims to ensure that the information system functions properly, protects sensitive information, and meets organizational goals. By using an information system audit, it is hoped that it can help identify areas where improvements or improvements are needed to improve service quality and control existing security in information systems, including access management, data encryption, user activity monitoring, and data protection measures. From the research carried out, the final result was obtained, namely DSS03 (Manage Service Requests and Incidents) showing the overall level of capability in the DSS03 sub-process and the average results for the DSS03 IT Process itself are shown in table 3 process capability domain DSS03 manage operations.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.950
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.024

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.017
GPT teacher head0.258
Teacher spread0.241 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it