Diagnosa Penyakit Kulit (Dermatitis) menggunakan Metode Certainty Factor
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Dermatitis is an inflammatory skin disease that is accompanied by itchy skin. It occurs in infants, and gets better in adolescence, but some cases can persist for a long time or even develop the disease in adulthood. In general, if you have this skin disease, you should see a skin specialist for a consultation. However, skin specialists are not always at the hospital, making it difficult for patients to arrange appointments to meet or consult. Therefore, the hospital needs to have an additional system that can help facilitate the medical team to detect the type of dermatitis disease based on symptoms (blistering skin, redness of the skin, scaly and dry skin, dark skin, blistering skin, cracked skin that is present in the disease, atopic dermatitis, contact dermatitis, seberoic dermatitis, nummular dermatitis, and intertriginous dermatitis and get handling and understanding of dermatitis disease using the certainty factor method. From the analysis carried out, the results of the diagnosis of the selected symptoms are obtained, the most accurate diagnosis is Atopic Dermatitis 98% with the treatment given, namely Corticosteroids and Antihistamines to patients.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it