MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4404337734 · doi:10.53555/sfs.v9i2.3183

Challenges Faced by Educational Institutions in India During Covid-19

2022· article· en· W4404337734 on OpenAlexvenueno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Survey in Fisheries Sciences · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPsychology
TopicCOVID-19 and Mental Health
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCoronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19)2019-20 coronavirus outbreakSevere acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2)PandemicPolitical scienceVirologyMedicineInternal medicineOutbreak

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Academic institutions around the world were being shifted from traditional learning process to online teaching due to Covid-19 pandemic situation. This situation was very much acute for developing countries like India. The education sector was rampantly devasted and that directly linked to the financial future to the country. The pandemic situation forced to remain isolated in society. The people resided inside the home and led to mental Stress. Due to this reason, challenges appear to the people free from mental stress. Online teaching is the finest way out to face the challenges of education during this pandemic Situation of covid-19. The challenges have also generated the opportunities for the institution to raise their efficient knowledge and vast communication to meet the Covid-19 situation. Our Indian education System is more familiar with face-to-face teaching and this Pandemic situation appears to us as a great obstacle regarding this. This study aims to find out the challenges faced by the educational institution during Covid-19 all over this Indian sub-continent from the perspective of teachers. To obtain the data the teachers were approached and requested to fill in the google form questionnaire. This received data was Calculated, analyzed and discuss to the following manner.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.028
Threshold uncertainty score0.055

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0060.002
Scholarly communication0.0030.001
Open science0.0010.004
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.435
GPT teacher head0.452
Teacher spread0.017 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Survey in Fisheries Sciences→Same topicCOVID-19 and Mental Health→French-language works237,207→