Tiny Learning-Based MPC for Multirotors: Solver-Aware Learning for Efficient Embedded Predictive Control
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Tiny aerial robots hold great promise for applications such as environmental monitoring and search-and-rescue, yet face significant control challenges due to limited onboard computing power and nonlinear dynamics. Model Predictive Control (MPC) enables agile trajectory tracking and constraint handling but depends on an accurate dynamics model. While existing Learning-Based (LB) MPC methods, such as Gaussian Process (GP) MPC, enhance performance by learning residual dynamics, their high computational cost restricts onboard deployment on tiny robots. This paper introduces Tiny LB MPC, a co-designed MPC framework and optimization solver for resource-constrained micro multirotor platforms. The proposed approach achieves 100 Hz control on a Crazyflie 2.1 equipped with a Teensy 4.0 microcontroller, demonstrating a 43% average improvement in tracking performance over existing embedded MPC methods under model uncertainty, and achieving the first onboard implementation of LB MPC on a 53 g multirotor.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".