An Asymptotic Analysis of Spike Self-Replication and Spike Nucleation of Reaction-Diffusion Patterns on Growing 1-D Domains
Bibliographic record
Abstract
In the asymptotic limit of a large diffusivity ratio, certain two-component reaction-diffusion (RD) systems can admit localized spike solutions on a 1-D finite domain in a far-from-equilibrium nonlinear regime. It is known that two distinct bifurcation mechanisms can occur which generate spike patterns of increased spatial complexity as the domain half-length L slowly increases; so-called spike nucleation and spike self-replication. Self-replication is found to occur via the passage beyond a saddle-node bifurcation point that can be predicted through linearization around the inner spike profile. In contrast, spike nucleation occurs through slow passage beyond the saddle-node of a nonlinear boundary-value problem defined in the outer region away from the core of a spike. Here, by treating L as a static parameter, precise conditions are established within the semi-strong interaction asymptotic regime to determine which occurs, conditions that are confirmed by numerical simulation and continuation. For the Schnakenberg and Brusselator RD models, phase diagrams in parameter space are derived that predict whether spike self-replication or spike nucleation will occur first as L is increased, or whether no such instability will occur. For the Gierer-Meinhardt model with a non-trivial activator background, spike nucleation is shown to be the only possible spike-generating mechanism. From time-dependent PDE numerical results on an exponentially slowly growing domain, it is shown that the analytical thresholds derived from the asymptotic theory accurately predict critical values of L where either spike self-replication or spike-nucleation will occur. The global bifurcation mechanism for transitions to patterns of increased spatial complexity is further elucidated by superimposing time-dependent PDE simulation results on the numerically computed solution branches of spike equilibria.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".