MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4404346082 · doi:10.1016/j.istruc.2024.107798

Shear behaviour of the post-tensioned segmental precast concrete pontoon deck with the GFRP rods

2024· article· en· W4404346082 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueStructures · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicStructural Behavior of Reinforced Concrete
Canadian institutionsUniversité de Sherbrooke
FundersDepartment of Transport and Main Roads, Queensland GovernmentCooperative Research Centres, Australian Government Department of IndustryUniversity of Southern Queensland
KeywordsPrecast concreteDeckStructural engineeringShear (geology)Fibre-reinforced plasticRodMaterials scienceGeotechnical engineeringGeologyEngineeringComposite material

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The present experimental and numerical study evaluated the structural performance of segmental concrete pontoon decks reinforced and post-tensioned with GFRP rods. Four large-scale decks were tested and the load-displacement response, strain behaviour of rods, concrete, and failure mechanism in four different prestressing levels were assessed. It was found that a small post-tensioning of 7.4 % of the rod's ultimate tensile strength reduced the self-weight deflection by 92 % and increased initial stiffness by 8.7 times compared to segmental decks without prestressing. Failure in prestressing decks typically began with concrete crushing at the joint with an increased compression depth due to increased initial post-tension; however, the ultimate failure mechanism of the hand-tight deck was governed by the interlaminar shear of the rod. A finite element model was developed and verified against test results A parametric study evaluating the influence of the post-tensioning at higher load, rod depth, concrete properties, rod number, and deck geometry was implemented. It was shown that increasing the post-tension load and depth of the rod improved the stiffness and reducing the spacing can result in a more uniform compression stress in the joint. This study provides design recommendations for ACI 440.4 R-04, by considering the concrete compression depth between joints rather than the depth of the FRP rod and contributes to a more accurate load estimation of the concrete crushing caused by joint openings. The results of this research could rectify the present problems with the construction design of maritime infrastructure and offer an innovative solution.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.309
Threshold uncertainty score0.552

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.006
GPT teacher head0.211
Teacher spread0.206 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it