Heterogeneity of definition of upper gastrointestinal tract in different guidelines of Crohn's disease: A scoping review
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Crohn's Disease (CD) can affect any part of the gastrointestinal (GI) tract, including the upper GI tract (UGIT). However, the definitions and classifications of upper GI CD (UGICD) vary. We conducted a scoping review to explore how UGIT and UGICD are defined and to assess the heterogeneity of these definitions in published CD guidelines, aiming to inform future initiatives for harmonizing definitions. We conducted a search of MEDLINE and Embase for English-language guidelines on CD that mentioned upper GI-related terms in the titles, abstracts, or keywords from inception until 26 July 2024. Definitions of UGIT and UGICD were summarized descriptively. Of 1132 citations, only 19 records met our inclusion criteria. Only eight were identified as CD guidelines. None of them focuses on UGICD. Among these, five diagnostic guidelines explicitly mentioned "upper GI" in their abstracts. Only the joint European Crohn's and Colitis Organisation and European Society of Gastrointestinal and Abdominal Radiology guidelines clearly defined the UGIT. Most guidelines mentioned UGI terms related to upper endoscopy or biopsy only. It was unclear whether these guidelines typically included the esophagus, stomach, and duodenum in the definition of UGICD while excluding the distal small intestine. Although the latest guideline related to pediatric-onset IBD cited the 2011 Paris classification, none of the three guidelines published after that explicitly mentioned the proposed subdivided location of the upper disease. There is a lack of consistent reporting in defining UGICD according to disease location. It is unclear whether there is a consensus on excluding the small intestine beyond the duodenum. Additionally, there is no indication that the subdivided location of UGIT was considered in CD guideline development. Greater consistency in definitions would aid in diagnosis, clinical care, epidemiological research and inclusion into clinical trials. These findings underscore the need for developing a framework to standardize the classification of UGICD, especially for clinical trials.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".