Climate change and urban flooding: assessing remote sensing data and flood modeling techniques: a comprehensive review
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This review critically examines the current understanding of climate change impacts on urban flooding, synthesizing recent findings to provide a comprehensive overview of how rising temperatures, sea-level rise, and increased extreme weather events influence urban flooding. Additionally, it discusses various flood modeling techniques, outlining their advantages and disadvantages. Covering a broad spectrum of studies published between 2007 and 2024, selected for their relevance and approach, this review highlights several key findings. Climate change significantly exacerbates urban flooding disasters, with remote sensing emerging as an indispensable tool for climate change and flood monitoring and prediction. Despite these advancements, notable gaps remain in the literature. There is a conspicuous lack of long-term impact studies and limited discourse on the efficacy of existing mitigation strategies. Additionally, the review underscores the deficiency of real-time flood monitoring systems specifically designed for urban areas. These gaps highlight an urgent need for targeted research and the development of adaptive management practices to enhance flood prediction and management in urban settings. Future research must focus on advancing real-time monitoring systems, integrating remote sensing technologies more effectively, and developing comprehensive flood models. The review also emphasizes the importance of interdisciplinary approaches that merge hydrology, climatology, urban planning, and technology. By consolidating existing research, this review serves as a valuable resource for researchers and policymakers. It underscores the critical need for innovative flood modeling techniques and adaptive management strategies to tackle the challenges posed by climate change. This synthesis not only enriches the current body of knowledge but also provides clear directions for future investigations, emphasizing the imperative for improved prediction, preparedness, and response mechanisms in urban flooding management.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.007 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.006 | 0.008 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".