MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4404360523 · doi:10.1017/cjn.2024.344

Fourth Nerve Palsy as the Presenting Manifestation of Giant Cell Arteritis

2024· article· en· W4404360523 on OpenAlexaffvenue
Samira Jafari, Jonathan A. Micieli

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Journal of Neurological Sciences / Journal Canadien des Sciences Neurologiques · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicVasculitis and related conditions
Canadian institutionsSt. Michael's HospitalKensington HealthUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGiant cell arteritisMedicinePalsyAbducens nerveAnatomyPhysical medicine and rehabilitationPathologyVasculitisDisease

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Conflicts of interest: the authors do not have any conflicts of interest to disclose.Giant Cell Arteritis (GCA) is a systemic vasculitis that predominantly affects medium and large arteries, often involving cranial vessels.While all patients over the age of 50 presenting with a new onset of diplopia should be evaluated for GCA, the manifestation of diplopia as a symptom of this condition is rare.A literature review reveals a small number of documented cases associated with cranial nerve palsies (1); however, documented cases with isolated fourth nerve palsy are exceedingly rare.Furthermore, limited information about treatment responses in such atypical presentations is available.This report introduces a unique case of GCA presenting as an isolated fourth nerve palsy, underscoring the importance of considering GCA in rare neurological presentations and enhancing our understanding of its clinical spectrum.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Case report · Consensus signal: Case report
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.007
Threshold uncertainty score0.019

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.002
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0030.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0060.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.025
GPT teacher head0.268
Teacher spread0.243 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designCase report
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2024
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Journal of Neurological Sciences / Journal Canadien des Sciences NeurologiquesSame topicVasculitis and related conditionsFrench-language works237,207