Changes in functional status during and after pregnancy in people with cerebral palsy: An international observational study
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Background: There is limited information surrounding physical changes people with cerebral palsy (CP) experience during pregnancy. Methodology: This is a subgroup analysis of an international online questionnaire, developed with input from individuals with CP. Data collection included demographics, baseline functional status, and functional status changes during pregnancy. Descriptive analysis was used. Results: 158 participants from 15 countries participated of which 30 had a total of 49 pregnancies resulting in birth. Worsened strength, spasticity, bladder function and fatigue occurred in 56.5% (13/23), 47.8% (11/23), 56.5% (13/23) and 87.0% (20/23) of participants. 9/23 (40.9%) required new mobility devices. Worsening of fatigue, strength, spasticity and need for a new mobility device was reported by all groups regardless of functional status. Conclusions: People with CP may experience significant functional changes during pregnancy, even those who mobilized independently prior to pregnancy. These findings may inform obstetricians, nurses, neurologists and physiatrists, and contribute to preconception counselling.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.004 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".