MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4404363878 · doi:10.1180/mgm.2024.53

Rundqvistite-(Ce), Na<sub>3</sub>(Sr<sub>3</sub>Ce)(Zn<sub>2</sub>Si<sub>8</sub>O<sub>24</sub>), a new mineral from the Darai-Pioz alkaline massif, Tien-Shan Mountains, Tajikistan: mineral description and crystal structure

2024· article· en· W4404363878 on OpenAlexaff
Atali A. Agakhanov, Maxwell C. Day, Elena Sokolova, Vladimir Yu. Karpenko, F. C. Hawthorne, Leonid A. Pautov, Anatoly V. Kasatkin, Igor V. Pekov, Vitaliya A. Agakhanova

Bibliographic record

VenueMineralogical Magazine · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMaterials Science
TopicCrystal Structures and Properties
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Manitoba
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMineralMassifMineralogyGeologyGeochemistryMaterials scienceMetallurgy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Rundqvistite-(Ce), ideally Na 3 (Sr 3 Ce)(Zn 2 Si 8 O 24 ), is a new mineral from the Darai-Pioz alkaline massif, Tien-Shan Mountains, Tajikistan. The mineral occurs as elongated grains up to 0.1 mm long and up to 0.03 mm thick embedded in quartz–pectolite aggregate in a silexite-like peralkaline pegmatite. Associated minerals are quartz, fluorite, pectolite, baratovite, aegirine, leucosphenite, neptunite, reedmergnerite, orlovite, sokolovaite, mendeleevite-(Ce), odigitriaite, pekovite, zeravshanite, kirchhoffite and garmite. The mineral is colourless with a vitreous lustre and a white streak, brittle, D meas. is 3.70(2) and D calc. is 3.709 g/cm 3 . Rundqvistite-(Ce) is monoclinic, space group P 2 1 / c , a = 5.1934(16), b = 7.8934(16), c = 26.011(5) Å, β = 90.02(3)° and V = 1066.3(4) Å 3 . The chemical composition of rundqvistite-(Ce) is SiO 2 40.17, La 2 O 3 2.64, Ce 2 O 3 7.55, Pr 2 O 3 0.80, Nd 2 O 3 2.43, Sm 2 O 3 0.33, Eu 2 O 3 0.09, Gd 2 O 3 0.24, Tb 2 O 3 0.18, Dy 2 O 3 0.21, PbO 1.03, SrO 19.83, FeO 0.37, ZnO 13.08, CaO 2.55, Na 2 O 8.04, total 99.54 wt.%. The empirical formula calculated on 24 O apfu (atoms per formula unit) is Na 3.10 Sr 2.29 Ca 0.54 Pb 0.06 (Ce 0.55 La 0.19 Nd 0.17 Pr 0.06 Sm 0.02 Gd 0.02 Eu 0.01 Tb 0.01 Dy 0.01 ) Σ1.04 Zn 1.92 Fe 0.06 Si 8.00 O 24 Z = 2. The structural formula based on refined site-occupancies is (Na 2.94 Sr 0.06 ) Σ3.00 [(Sr 2.23 Ca 0.54 Pb 0.06 Na 0.13 ) Σ2.96 Ln 3+ 1.04 ] Σ4.00 [(Zn 1.92 Fe 2+ 0.06 ) Σ1.98 Si 8 O 24 ], where Ln 3+ 1.04 = (Ce 0.55 La 0.19 Nd 0.17 Pr 0.06 Sm 0.02 Gd 0.02 Eu 0.01 Tb 0.01 Dy 0.01 ) Σ1.04 . The crystal structure of rundqvistite-(Ce) was refined to R 1 = 2.76% on the basis of 3184 unique reflections [ F &gt; 4σ| F |]. In rundqvistite-(Ce), the main structural unit is a (Zn 2 Si 8 O 24 ) 12– sheet parallel to (100). In the sheet, the Si and Zn tetrahedra form four-, five- and eight-membered rings. The interstitial cations at the Na and M (1–3) sites sum to [Na 3 (Sr 3 Ce)] 12– apfu. The Na and M(1–3) polyhedra share common edges to form a layer. Rundqvistite-(Ce) is a structural analogue of vladykinite, ideally Na 3 Sr 4 (Fe 2+ Fe 3+ )Si 8 O 24 . Rundqvistite-(Ce) and vladykinite are related by the following substitution: [8] Ce 3+ + [4] (Zn 2+ ) 2 ↔ [8] Sr 2+ + [4] (Fe 2+ Fe 3+ ). The mineral is named after Dmitry Vasilievich Rundqvist (1930–2022), a prominent Russian geologist and an expert on the geology of ore deposits, metallogeny and mineralogy of Precambrian rocks.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Scholarly communication, Research integrity
Consensus categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Research integrity
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.026
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0030.002
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0030.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0010.002
Scholarly communication0.0030.002
Open science0.0020.002
Research integrity0.0020.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.018
GPT teacher head0.221
Teacher spread0.203 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMineralogical MagazineSame topicCrystal Structures and PropertiesFrench-language works237,207