MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4404370714 · doi:10.1371/journal.pgph.0003762

A consensus statement on dual purpose pathogen surveillance systems: The always on approach

2024· article· en· W4404370714 on OpenAlexaff
Helene‐Mari van der Westhuizen, S. Soundararajan, Tamsin Berry, David B. Agus, Sergio Ruiz‐Carmona, Philip Ma, Jessica T. Davis, A. Sarah Walker, Jolynne Mokaya, Stephen D. Bentley, Nick Thomson, John Silitoe, Andrew C. Singer, Romina Mariano, Megan Akodu, Gabriel Seidman, Nabihah Sachedina, Jonathan Edgeworth, R Naidoo, Tariro Makadzange, Vladimir Choi, Renuka Gadde, Samuel V. Scarpino, Corinna Bull, Kumeren Govender, Belinda Ngongo, Hinda Ruton, Paul Pronyk, Kate Smolina, H. Li, Dylan Barry, S. Schaffer, Vanessa Moeder, George F. Gao, Derrick W. Crook, John L. Bell

Bibliographic record

VenuePLOS Global Public Health · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicZoonotic diseases and public health
Canadian institutionsBC Centre for Disease ControlUniversity of British Columbia
Fundersnot available
KeywordsStatement (logic)Dual (grammatical number)Dual purposeComputer sciencePolitical scienceEngineeringLawPhilosophyLinguistics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The COVID-19 pandemic progressed pathogen surveillance, from improved wastewater surveillance expertise and infrastructure, increased genomic sequencing capacity, to better integration between large datasets that informed policy decisions. Yet current systems are inadequate for a future facing frequent pandemics threats [1]. There is inequitable access to pathogen surveillance globally, with existing infrastructure favouring high-income countries resulting in blind spots for collective health resilience [2]. We are concerned that political attention and investment in pandemic preparedness is waning, with missed opportunities to respond to the concurrent crises posed by antimicrobial resistance.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.170
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.195
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.170
Threshold uncertainty score0.899

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.1700.195
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0030.002
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0040.006
Bibliometrics0.0040.004
Science and technology studies0.0080.012
Scholarly communication0.0140.013
Open science0.0160.017
Research integrity0.0630.059
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0100.011

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.086
GPT teacher head0.337
Teacher spread0.251 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePLOS Global Public HealthSame topicZoonotic diseases and public healthFrench-language works237,207