MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4404373725 · doi:10.14430/arctic80162

Seasonal Variability of Ice Motion for Hubbard and Valerie Glaciers, Alaska

2024· article· en· W4404373725 on OpenAlexfundvenueno aff
Courtney Bayer, Wesley Van Wychen, Anna Wendleder, Brittany Main

Bibliographic record

VenueARCTIC · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicCryospheric studies and observations
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaEnvironment and Climate Change CanadaUniversity of WaterlooArcticNet
KeywordsGlacierGeologyClimatologyPhysical geographyMotion (physics)OceanographyCryosphereGeographySea iceGeomorphologyComputer scienceArtificial intelligence

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Hubbard Glacier is a large fast-flowing tidewater-terminating glacier in the St. Elias Mountains and is connected at its terminus to Valerie Glacier. Although Hubbard Glacier has been shown to experience large intra-annual velocity changes and a long-term deceleration, previous seasonality studies have had limited timescale without a dense record of motion. Valerie Glacier’s variability has also been understudied, with only one study reporting its seasonal behaviour. The goal of this study was to combine ITS_LIVE, RADARSAT-2, RADARSAT Constellation Mission, and TerraSAR-X/TanDEM-X derived velocity data to create the densest record of motion ever constructed for Hubbard and Valerie glaciers from July 2013-April 2022 in order to explore seasonal velocity variability of both glaciers. Air temperature (NCEP-NCAR Reanalysis) was used to estimate surface melt on the glaciers, which was explored as a potential driver for seasonal velocity changes. Valerie Glacier had a seasonal pattern of fast flow in May, with minimum flow between August-November before accelerating again. Hubbard Glacier displayed a unique seasonal pattern that has not been previously observed on this glacier, with two periods of fast motion: one in May and one in December-February. It is inferred that the spring peaks and late summer/fall minimums on both glaciers are due to meltwater reaching the glacier bed and influencing the subglacial hydrology. The cause of the winter peak and slight velocity drop before the spring peak on Hubbard Glacier has not been determined and should be a topic for future studies, although it is hypothesized to influenced by its geometry.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.042
Threshold uncertainty score0.475

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.019
GPT teacher head0.228
Teacher spread0.209 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueARCTICSame topicCryospheric studies and observationsFrench-language works237,207