A Comprehensive LC–MS Metabolomics Assay for Quantitative Analysis of Serum and Plasma
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Background/Objectives: Targeted metabolomics is often criticized for the limited metabolite coverage that it offers. Indeed, most targeted assays developed or used by researchers measure fewer than 200 metabolites. In an effort to both expand the coverage and improve the accuracy of metabolite quantification in targeted metabolomics, we decided to develop a comprehensive liquid chromatography–tandem mass spectrometry (LC–MS/MS) assay that could quantitatively measure more than 700 metabolites in serum or plasma. Methods: The developed assay makes use of chemical derivatization followed by reverse phase LC–MS/MS and/or direct flow injection MS (DFI–MS) in both positive and negative ionization modes to separate metabolites. Multiple reaction monitoring (MRM), in combination with isotopic standards and multi-point calibration curves, is used to detect and absolutely quantify the targeted metabolites. The assay has been adapted to a 96-well plate format to enable automated, high-throughput sample analysis. Results: The assay (called MEGA) is able to detect and quantify 721 metabolites in serum/plasma, covering 20 metabolite classes and many commonly used clinical biomarkers. The limits of detection were determined to range from 1.4 nM to 10 mM, recovery rates were from 80% to 120%, and quantitative precision was within 20%. LC–MS/MS metabolite concentrations of the NIST® SRM®1950 plasma standard were found to be within 15% of NMR quantified levels. The MEGA assay was further validated in a large dietary intervention study. Conclusions: The MEGA assay should make comprehensive quantitative metabolomics much more affordable, accessible, automatable, and applicable to large-scale clinical studies.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.004 | 0.005 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.004 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.004 | 0.006 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".