Bibliographic record
Abstract
Por Maria Nazareth de Lima Arrais, tradução do original de Trudel, Eric. Simulacremultimodal et sémiosis visuelle in Asel : vol. 27, nº 2, 2022 O artigo trata da problemática do imaginário mental na interpretação dos significados icônicos. Trata-se de interrogar, para o enunciado icônico, a hipótese de François Rastier, segundo a qual «[..]as imagens mentais são restritas (mas não inteiramente determinadas) pelos significados [no contexto]» (1991, p. 242), entendendo-se que, na sitemática rasteriana, o significado, que pertence à esfera semiótica, distingue-se do conceito que se origina da esfera cognitiva.Mais precisamente, trata-se de transpor, para a semiose visual, o conceito de simulacro multimodal, proposto por Rastier (1991), tipo de conteúdo eidético que seria gerado ou pelo menos solicitado pela estrutura semântica da mensagem. Nessahipotese, a interpretação do signo icônico suscitaria, cognitivamente, apresentações que associam, potencialmente, diferentes modalidades sensoriais representadas e eventualmentecaracterísticas abstratas.A transposição conceitual que propõe o presente artigo integra, nas proposições rasterianas, os resultados do trabalho da psicologia cognitiva sobre a imagem mental.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.007 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.008 | 0.007 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".