MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4404385876 · doi:10.1145/3698038.3698557

Pack: Towards Communication-Efficient Homomorphic Encryption in Federated Learning

2024· article· en· W4404385876 on OpenAlexaff
Zeyuan Zuo, Ningxin Su, Baochun Li, Teng Zhang

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicCryptography and Data Security
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
FundersYoung Scientists FundHealth and Medical Research FundUniversitas Brawijaya
KeywordsHomomorphic encryptionComputer scienceEncryptionComputer security

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Federated learning allows multiple clients to collaboratively train a shared model without sharing local private data. It is regarded as privacy-preserving since only model updates are communicated. Unfortunately, it has been shown in the recent literature that, model updates transmitted by participating clients can be used by a malicious server in gradient leakage attacks to obtain private training data. To prevent such potential leakage from occurring, it has widely been acknowledged that homomorphic encryption can be used to encrypt these model updates before sending them to the server, which performs computations directly on encrypted data. Although homomorphic encryption has a strong guarantee on privacy, its practical use increases communication overhead by around 17×, even with its most efficient implementation, called CKKS. In this paper, we present Pack, a novel communication-efficient mechanism over CKKS, designed specifically to reduce the communication overhead by a substantial margin. In addition, we propose new error correction and weight filtering mechanisms in Pack to improve the accuracy of the trained model. Compared to vanilla CKKS, Pack reduces the communication overhead by 3.1×, while increasing the accuracy by 5.5% and 2.5% under the i.i.d. and non-i.i.d. settings.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.965
Threshold uncertainty score0.558

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.256
Teacher spread0.242 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicCryptography and Data SecurityFrench-language works237,207