MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4404387997 · doi:10.1016/j.clnu.2024.11.016

Global burden of disease attributable to metabolic risk factors in adolescents and young adults aged 15–39, 1990–2021

2024· article· en· W4404387997 on OpenAlexaff
Xiaodong Zhou, Qin‐Fen Chen, Giovanni Targher, Christopher D. Byrne, Christos S. Mantzoros, Huijie Zhang, Amedeo Lonardo, Gregory Y.H. Lip, Gilda Porta, Anoop Misra, Andrew Gerard Robertson, Fei Luo, Anna Alisi, Wah Yang, Mortada El‐Shabrawi, Hazem Al Momani, Virend K. Somers, Christos S. Katsouras, Nahúm Méndez‐Sánchez, Sander Lefere, Olivia Szepietowski, Ki‐Chul Sung, Nicholas Beng Hui Ng, Luca Valenti, Way Seah Lee, Alice P.S. Kong, Mehmet Kızılkaya, Ponsiano Ocama, Arshad Ali, Octavio Viveiros, John Ryan, Carlos J. Toro‐Huamanchumo, Nilanka Perera, Karim Ataya, Kenneth Yuh Yen Kok, Jordi Gracia‐Sancho, Ala I. Sharara, Arun Prasad, Rodolfo J. Oviedo, Орал Оспанов, Elena Ruiz‐Úcar, Khalid Alswat, Syed Imran Abbas, Tamer N. Abdelbaki, Yu Jun Wong, Yasser Fouad, Michael D. Shapiro, Flora Bacopoulou, Silvia Sookoian, Mohit Kehar, Wah‐Kheong Chan, Sombat Treeprasertsuk, Leon A. Adams, Serap Turan, Mauricio Zuluaga, Carlos J. Pirola, Omar Thaher, Gabriel A Molina, Nozim Adxamovich Jumaev, Said A. Al‐Busafi, Christopher Opio, Michelle Ching Lim-Loo, Cosmas Rinaldi Adithya Lesmana, Lubna Kamani, Ming‐Hua Zheng

Bibliographic record

VenueClinical Nutrition · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicObesity, Physical Activity, Diet
Canadian institutionsChildren's Hospital of Eastern OntarioUniversité de Montréal
FundersNational Key Research and Development Program of China Stem Cell and Translational ResearchNational Key Research and Development Program of ChinaNational Natural Science Foundation of China
KeywordsMedicineBurden of diseaseEnvironmental healthDiseaseDisease burdenAttributable riskGerontologyInternal medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex
No abstract in any covered source. Its absence is recorded, not treated as a negative.

No abstract. This is not a gap in this database; OpenAlex has none either. 23.3% of the frame is in this state, and the screen finds HALF as much metaresearch here, so the absence is a measured bias rather than a missing field.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.007
Threshold uncertainty score0.689

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.025
GPT teacher head0.337
Teacher spread0.312 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations45
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractno

Explore more

Same venueClinical NutritionSame topicObesity, Physical Activity, DietFrench-language works237,207