Numerical Investigation of the Nonlinear Drill String Dynamics Under Stick–Slip Vibration
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This paper presents a comprehensive analysis of the influence of rotary table velocity, weight-on-bit, and viscous damping on the drill string stick–slip vibration. The analysis allows for studying the qualitative and quantitative variation of the dynamic response of the drill pipes and drill collars/bit. To achieve this goal, a robust and practical finite element (FE) model of the full-scaled drill string was developed based on a velocity-weakening formulation of the nonlinear bit–rock interaction. A detailed investigation of damping parameters was carried out. The performance of the developed model was verified through comparisons with a lumped-parameter model and a field test example. Parametric studies on the stick–slip response of the entire drill string under different field operational conditions were conducted. The dynamical time series of the system response were analyzed in terms of the phase planes, response spectra, and descriptive statistics of the drill pipes and drill collars. The findings of the study revealed that for a realistic drill string geometry, the angular velocity (i.e., mean, peak-to-peak amplitude, and standard deviation) and dominant frequency of self-excited torsional stick–slip oscillations along the drill pipes and drill collars/bit are mainly governed by the rotary table velocity. Furthermore, it was shown that the contribution of higher harmonics in the torsional stick–slip response of the drill pipes is more substantial than the drill collars/bit.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".