La survivance du marais. Essai de rephotographie narrative du quartier de False Creek Flats à Vancouver
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Cet article se propose de contribuer à la réflexion sur la pratique de la rephotographie à partir d’un terrain de recherche mené dans la ville de Vancouver au Canada. Ce terrain de recherche se situe géographiquement dans le quartier post-industriel de False Creek Flats qui est aujourd’hui en cours de requalification urbaine et suit un programme majeur de restructuration à l’horizon 2037. J’ai tenté de cerner la dynamique des transformations de cette zone urbaine, par l’intermédiaire de deux sources visuelles – des captations photographiques systématiques in situ et des recherches dans les archives visuelles de Vancouver – afin d’aboutir, par leur composition, à une proposition de rephotographie narrative. Les montages réalisés permettent de construire un contre-récit à celui, officiel, d’une ville sans « histoire ». Ils s’attachent à réintroduire le temps long en renouant avec le passé aquatique de la baie.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.017 | 0.007 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.007 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.011 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".