MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4404393840 · doi:10.3899/jrheum.2024-0828

Cardiovascular Health and Adverse Pregnancy Outcomes in Autoimmune Rheumatic Diseases

2024· editorial· en· W4404393840 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Vijaya Prasanna Parimi, Vinod Ravindran

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Journal of Rheumatology · 2024
Typeeditorial
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicSystemic Sclerosis and Related Diseases
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicinePregnancyAdverse effectAutoimmune diseaseRheumatic diseaseIntensive care medicineImmunologyInternal medicineRheumatoid arthritisDisease

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Autoimmune rheumatic diseases (ARDs) primarily affect women during their reproductive years, and pregnancy can be enormously challenging in these women. Increased prevalence of adverse pregnancy outcomes (APOs) in these women, such as preterm birth (PTB), small for gestational age (SGA), and preeclampsia, is well recognized. Additionally, there is evidence to suggest that pregnancy may contribute to the progression of preclinical autoimmune disease and APOs might be the clue to such progression.1 In women without ARDs, multiple studies have underscored a link between APOs and the mother’s increased risk of future cardiovascular disease (CVD).2-5 However, it is unclear whether similar risks exist in women with ARDs, such as systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE), antiphospholipid syndrome (APS), and rheumatoid arthritis (RA), and whether CVD-related events somehow translate into APOs in these women. Quantifying and understanding underlying mechanisms are crucial, as cardiovascular (CV) morbidity and mortality are higher in several ARDs.6,7 In this issue of The Journal of Rheumatology , Dhital et al explore the relationship between CV events (CVEs) that occurred during pregnancy and the risks of APOs (PTB, SGA, or a composite of either) among women with ARDs in a large, retrospective population cohort of pregnant women who gave birth to singleton liveborn infants, using relevant linked databases.8 They found higher CVEs in pregnant women with ARDs (1.4%) and APS (5.5%) compared to those who had neither (0.3%). Rates of APOs were also higher in women with ARDs (26.9%) and APS (21.2%) than in those without (15.2%). Additionally, CVEs were linked to a higher risk of composite APOs for all groups under study, with adjusted risk ratios ranging from 1.2 to 1.4. Compared to the control group (those without CVEs or ARDs/APS), the adjusted risk differences of APOs per 100 births were 7.8 (95% … Address correspondence to Dr. V. Ravindran, Centre for Rheumatology, Calicut, Kerala 673009, India. Email: drvinod12{at}gmail.com.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.006
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Editorial · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.008
Threshold uncertainty score0.015

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.006
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.270
Teacher spread0.260 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEditorial

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Journal of Rheumatology→Same topicSystemic Sclerosis and Related Diseases→French-language works237,207→