MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4404396740 · doi:10.56294/dm2025469

Design and Implementation of an Adaptive Tutoring System for Enhanced E-Learning

2024· article· en· W4404396740 on OpenAlexaff
Atmane El Hadbi, Mohammed Hatim Rziki, Yassine Jamil, Zaynab Ammari, Mohamed Khalifa Boutahir, Hamid Bourray, Driss El Ouadghiri

Bibliographic record

VenueData & Metadata · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicIntelligent Tutoring Systems and Adaptive Learning
Canadian institutionsArtificial Intelligence in Medicine (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputer scienceMultimediaHuman–computer interactionComputer architecture

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The increasing offer of new information and communication technologies has changed the educational field, e-learning emerged as an important complement to traditional face-to-face education and often a good alternative in many contexts. This shift has been emphasized by global challenges such as the COVID-19 pandemic, which highlighted the importance of remote learning platforms and their effectiveness in such situations. However, many challenges such as the costs and the need for personalized and interactive learning environments remain an obstacle. To address these issues, adaptive e-learning systems and Intelligent Tutoring Systems (ITS) are increasingly being developed and given support by education communities and governments. These systems aim to adapt content to the learner’s cognitive abilities and individual learning styles, for better understanding and retention. This paper explores the design and development of an adaptive ITS, which integrates Artificial Intelligence and data analytics to provide better learning experience. This paper puts the light on the role of adaptive hypermedia in educational interactions, analyzing its key features and how they can be leveraged to enhance learning outcomes. By incorporating learning success metrics, our study provides a comprehensive perspective on the potential of ITS to revolutionize adaptive and personalized e-learning systems, driving significant improvements in both learner engagement and achievement.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.013

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0020.001
Research integrity0.0020.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.082
GPT teacher head0.344
Teacher spread0.262 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueData & MetadataSame topicIntelligent Tutoring Systems and Adaptive LearningFrench-language works237,207