MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4404399119 · doi:10.2196/68503

Correction: Psychological Safety Competency Training During the Clinical Internship From the Perspective of Health Care Trainee Mentors in 11 Pan-European Countries: Mixed Methods Observational Study

2024· erratum· en· W4404399119 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Irene Carrillo, Ivana Skoumalová, Ireen Bruus, Victoria Klemm, Sofia Guerra-Paiva, Bojana Knežević, Augustina Jankauskienė, Dragana Jocić, Susanna Tella, Sandra C. Buttiġieġ, Einav Srulovici, Andrea Madarasová Gecková, Kaja Põlluste, Reinhard Strametz, Paulo Sousa, Marina Odalović, José Joaquín Mira

Bibliographic record

VenueJMIR Medical Education · 2024
Typeerratum
Languageen
FieldPsychology
TopicCounseling Practices and Supervision
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsInternshipObservational studyPerspective (graphical)Medical educationHealth carePsychologyMedicineNursingFamily medicineApplied psychologyPolitical scienceComputer science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

[This corrects the article DOI: 10.2196/64125.].

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.008
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.149
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.055
Threshold uncertainty score0.117

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0080.149
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.001
Bibliometrics0.0030.003
Science and technology studies0.0040.002
Scholarly communication0.0030.002
Open science0.0030.002
Research integrity0.0070.011
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0350.014

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.157
GPT teacher head0.533
Teacher spread0.375 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJMIR Medical EducationSame topicCounseling Practices and SupervisionFrench-language works237,207