MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4404403294 · doi:10.1139/bcb-2024-0128

1-Deoxynojirimycin affects high glucose-induced pancreatic beta-cell dysfunction through regulating CEBPA expression and AMPK pathway

2024· article· en· W4404403294 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Sheng-Gui Liu, Siqi Wang, Xinghui Ai

Bibliographic record

VenueBiochemistry and Cell Biology · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicPancreatic function and diabetes
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCEBPAApoptosisGene silencingBeta cellIntracellularAMPKSecretionReactive oxygen speciesCell biologyChemistryInsulinCancer researchBiologyInternal medicineEndocrinologyIsletBiochemistryMedicineGene

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This study aims to explore the role of 1-deoxynojirimycin (DNJ) in high glucose-induced β-cells and to further explore the molecular mechanism of DNJ effect on β-cells through network pharmacology. In the study, high glucose treatment of mouse INS-1 cells inhibited cell proliferation and insulin secretion, decreased the expression of Bcl-2 protein and Ins1 and Ins2 genes, promoted apoptosis, and increased cleaved caspase-3 and cleaved caspase-9 expression levels as well as intracellular reactive oxygen species production. DNJ treatment significantly restored the dysfunction of INS-1 cells induced by high glucose, and DNJ showed no toxicity to normal INS-1 cells. Silencing CEBPA promoted, while overexpression of CEBPA relieved the dysfunction of pancreatic β-cells induced by high glucose. DNJ treatment partially restored the pancreatic β-cell dysfunction caused by silencing CEBPA. In conclusion, DNJ can inhibit high glucose-induced pancreatic β-cell dysfunction by promoting the expression of CEBPA.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.002

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.235
Teacher spread0.222 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBiochemistry and Cell Biology→Same topicPancreatic function and diabetes→French-language works237,207→