scMoE: single-cell Multi-Modal Multi-Task Learning via Sparse Mixture-of-Experts
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Recent advances in measuring high-dimensional modalities, including protein levels and DNA accessibility, at the single-cell level have prompted the need for frameworks capable of handling multi-modal data while simultaneously addressing multiple tasks. Despite these advancements, much of the work in the single-cell domain remains limited, often focusing on either a single-modal or single-task perspective. A few recent studies have ventured into multimodal, multi-task learning, but we identified a ① Optimization Conflict issue, leading to suboptimal results when integrating additional modalities, which is undesirable. Furthermore, there is a ② Costly Interpretability challenge, as current approaches predominantly rely on costly post-hoc methods like SHAP. Motivated by these challenges, we introduce scMoE 1 , a novel framework that, for the first time, applies Sparse Mixture-of-Experts (SMoE) within the single-cell domain. This is achieved by incorporating an SMoE layer into a transformer block with a cross-attention module. Thanks to its design, scMoE inherently possesses mechanistic interpretability, a critical aspect for understanding underlying mechanisms when handling biological data. Furthermore, from a post-hoc perspective, we enhance interpretability by extending the concept of activation vectors (CAVs). Extensive experiments on simulated datasets, such as Dyngen , and real-world multi-modal single-cell datasets, including { DBiT-seq, Patch-seq, ATAC-seq }, demonstrate the effectiveness of scMoE . Source code of scMoE is available at: https://github.com/UNITES-Lab/scMoE .
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".