MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4404410692 · doi:10.1093/pch/pxae081

Persistent hyperbilirubinemia in a 1-week-old male

2024· article· en· W4404410692 on OpenAlexaff
Sarah K. White, Sarah Tehseen, Karen Leis, Daphne Yau

Bibliographic record

VenuePaediatrics & Child Health · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicNeonatal Health and Biochemistry
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Saskatchewan
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPediatricsMedicinePsychology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

An 8-day-old male infant presented with jaundice and poor feeding after an elevated transcutaneous bilirubin.He was born at 37 1/7 weeks via vacuum-assisted vaginal delivery after an uncomplicated pregnancy.Apgar scores were 5 and 9. Cord gases (arterial pH 7.23/base excess-2, venous pH 7.35/base excess-5) and newborn screen were normal.Birth weight was 3230 g (78.3 percentile).After discharge on day 7 of life, he presented to the emergency department for increased jaundice, abdominal distension, and not waking for feeds.He was afebrile with stable vitals.Jaundice was noted, but no bruising or cephalohematoma.His abdomen was soft with no palpable masses.Investigations revealed a normal complete blood count, C-reactive protein, procalcitonin, and electrolytes.Serum bilirubin was 398 mmol/L (indirect 390 mmol/L).His blood type was A+ and direct antiglobulin test (DAT) negative, with reticulocytes 62 10 9 /L.Lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) was 2016 U/L (range 225 to 600 U/L).He received intravenous fluids and intensive phototherapy.His bilirubin trended down but rebounded as fluids were weaned.Hematology consultation for the persistent hyperbilirubinemia and elevated LDH recommended testing for bleeding diathesis and an abdominal ultrasound.The latter showed a normal liver and spleen, but did reveal the cause of the patient's presentation.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.543
Threshold uncertainty score0.677

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.015
GPT teacher head0.283
Teacher spread0.267 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePaediatrics & Child HealthSame topicNeonatal Health and BiochemistryFrench-language works237,207