Smc5/6 - microtubules binding shapes pericentromeric chromatin
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Centromeres and pericentromeres are specialized chromatin regions essential for accurate chromosome segregation. Smc5/6, which localizes at pericentromeres, can bind microtubules, yet its role in chromatin folding is unclear. Here, we investigate the functional relevance of Smc5/6- microtubule binding in yeast, by targeting two lysines (K624, K631) within the Smc5 hinge domain known to mediate this binding. Using high-temporal-resolution imaging, polymer modelling, and in vitro approaches with a separation-of-function mutant smc5-2KE , we demonstrate that microtubules binding by Smc5/6 constrains chromatin dynamics and promotes pericentromeric folding. The smc5-2KE mutant, combined with a hypomorphic kinetochore mutant (Mtw1-3xGFP), leads to spindle and cytokinesis defects and triggers the spindle checkpoint. Furthermore, homologous recombination repair in pericentromeres is compromised. Overall, our findings indicate that Smc5/6 – microtubules association safeguard pericentromeric architecture and genome stability during mitosis.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".