Die Idee, die aus der Kälte kam – Community Art in Finnland
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Cet article présente le témoignage d’une artiste engagée qui s’est consacrée à « l’art communautaire » (Community Art). Ce mouvement, qui a vu le jour dans les années 60 aux Etats-Unis, s’est rapidement propagé au Canada, en Grande Bretagne, en Irlande et en Scandinavie. Il vise à mettre l’art au service de populations la plupart du temps marginalisées socialement, économiquement, culturellement ou géographiquement, afin de les soutenir dans leurs questionnements et la recherche de leurs propres réponses. L’art devient ainsi le catalyseur de transformations et le facilitateur de liens au sein de la communauté, locale ou virtuelle.L’artiste allemande Pia Bartsch est, grâce à la Fondation Saari qui attribue des bourses à des chercheurs en sciences sociales, sciences de l’esprit et en art, en résidence en Finlande où elle travaille avec les habitants de Mynämäki au sud-ouest du pays. A travers un journal de bord, elle relate trois expériences artistiques menées avec différents groupes d’habitants de tous âges dans le but de renforcer leur compréhension et leur attention mutuelles.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.023 | 0.027 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.008 | 0.005 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.007 |
| Research integrity | 0.003 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.013 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".