MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4404414139 · doi:10.4000/12i3c

« Je, tu, nous, vous »

2009· article· fr· W4404414139 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueFiligrane · 2009
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldPsychology
TopicPsychoanalysis and Psychopathology Research
Canadian institutionsMusée de la Civilisation
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPhysicsHumanitiesPhilosophy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

« Je, tu, nous, vous » est extrait du poème Keine Delikatessen d’Ingeborg Bachmann sur lequel sont construites en partie les « Résonances » de Luigi Nono (Risonanze erranti, 1985-87). Le compositeur, qui a rencontré l’écrivaine à plusieurs reprises, évoque ici les fragments interrogatifs de cette dernière poésie dans laquelle elle questionne l’acte d’écriture. « Devrai-je faire prisonnière une pensée, la conduire dans la cellule éclairée d’une phrase ? […] Faudra-t-il […] déchirer le papier […] détruisant ainsi : je, tu, il, elle, ça, nous, vous ? ». Le poème, mis en résonance avec l’écriture de Herman Melville (essentiellement Battlepieces and Aspects of the War) ainsi qu’avec les « échos » textuels et musicaux de Machaut, Desprez et Ockeghem, explore la nature de l’articulation entre pensée et écriture, entre individu et société ou soi et autrui, l’identité et le rôle complexe de l’artiste dans une société habitée par la violence, les rapports de domination et la guerre.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.406
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0230.020

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.028
GPT teacher head0.367
Teacher spread0.339 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it