An Empirical Study on the Determinants of Housing Prices in Beijing and Model Optimization
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This paper aims to investigate the potential factors influencing housing prices in Beijing and optimize the prediction model. Using the Kaggle dataset "Housing Price in Beijing", multiple factors affecting housing prices were examined, including square footage, bedroom count, bathroom count, follower count, the presence of an elevator, and subway proximity. The study initially established a multiple linear regression model (MLR) and then optimized the model through variable selection and hypothesis testing. The final model indicates that square footage, bathroom count, follower count, elevator presence, and subway accessibility significantly impact housing prices. Additionally, subway proximity positively correlates with housing prices, while increased square footage is negatively associated with price, possibly due to lower unit costs for larger properties and the higher market demand for smaller homes. By validating the model's performance using a test dataset, the final model demonstrates effective predictive capability and offers insights for future model improvements.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it