MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4404418548 · doi:10.3390/s24227296

Development of a Real-Time Wearable Humming Detector Device

2024· article· en· W4404418548 on OpenAlexafffund
Amine Mazouzi, Alexandre Campeau‐Lecours

Bibliographic record

VenueSensors · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicSpeech and Audio Processing
Canadian institutionsCentre Intégré Universitaire de Santé et de Services Sociaux du Centre-Sud-de-l'Île-de-MontréalCentre for Interdisciplinary Research in RehabilitationUniversité LavalCentre Intégré Universitaire de Santé et de Services Sociaux du Saguenay–Lac-Saint-Jean
FundersFonds de recherche du Québec
KeywordsHumWearable computerComputer scienceAccelerometerSoftware portabilityFast Fourier transformBluetooth Low EnergyDetectorSmartwatchEnergy (signal processing)Computer hardwareBluetoothEmbedded systemReal-time computingHuman–computer interactionWirelessTelecommunications

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This study focuses on the development of a wearable real-time Humming Detector Device (HDD) aimed at enhancing the control of assistive devices through humming. As the need for portable user-friendly tools in assistive technology grows, the HDD offers a non-invasive solution to detect vocal cord vibrations. Vibrations, detected thanks to an accelerometer worn on the neck, are processed in real time using a Fast Fourier Transform (FFT) to identify specific humming frequencies, which are then translated into commands for controlling assistive devices via Bluetooth Low Energy (BLE) transmission. The device was tested with 13 healthy subjects to validate its potential and determine the optimal number of distinct commands that users can achieve. The HDD's portability and precision make it a promising alternative to traditional voice recognition systems, particularly for individuals with speech impairments.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.012

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.018
GPT teacher head0.256
Teacher spread0.238 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueSensorsSame topicSpeech and Audio ProcessingFrench-language works237,207