MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4404418922 · doi:10.18280/ts.410519

Passenger Vehicle Driver Detection Based on YOLOv5+Stacking

2024· article· en· W4404418922 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

venuePublished in a venue whose home country is Canada.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueTraitement du signal · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicVehicle License Plate Recognition
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsStackingComputer scienceAutomotive engineeringTransport engineeringEngineeringPhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The intelligent detection of driver distracted driving and mask wearing can strengthen the safety management of passenger vehicle operators, the correct detection of drivers in monitoring images by regulatory authorities is the basis for the implementation of these two tasks.Although the traditional object detection model can detect the driver and the passenger accurately, there are still many wrong classification between the driver and the passenger.In order to increase the detection rate, this paper uses CBAM attention mechanism and the idea of non-maximum suppression in YOLO v5, and proposes a combination model of YOLOv5+Stacking integrated learning, which can effectively reduce false detection between drivers and passengers and ultimately increase the detection rate of YOLO v5 model.In this paper, this model is used to verify and detect the collected data set, and its evaluation indexes are not only better than the original YOLO v5 model but also better than other similar detection models.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.762
Threshold uncertainty score0.861

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.201
Teacher spread0.191 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it