MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4404420114 · doi:10.24908/pocus.v9i2.17709

Subclinical Congestion Evaluated by Point of Care Ultrasound (POCUS) at Discharge Predicts Readmission in Patients with Acute Heart Failure: Prognostic Cohort Study

2024· article· en· W4404420114 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Sergio Velasco‐Malagón, Estivalis Acosta‐Gutiérrez, José Atilio Núñez-Ramos, Sebastián Salinas Mendoza, Guillermo Mora Pabón

Bibliographic record

VenuePOCUS Journal · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicUltrasound in Clinical Applications
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineInternal medicineHeart failureCardiologyPopulationProspective cohort studyCohortOdds ratioSurgery

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background: Heart failure (HF) is a complex entity that increases the risk of adverse outcomes. Point of care ultrasound (POCUS) allows easy lung and systemic venous congestion identification. Using ultrasound to detect sub-clinical congestion at discharge may help predict readmissions and mortality. Outcomes: The primary outcome was to address 30-day rehospitalization, and as a secondary outcome we investigated readmission and mortality in patients with residual congestion assessed with POCUS. Methods: A prospective prognostic cohort study was conducted at a tertiary-level institution in Colombia. Patients with acute decompensated heart failure (ADHF) at discharge were evaluated using POCUS through lung ultrasound (LUS), portal vein pulsatility (PVP), and a composite assessment of residual congestion. Inclusion criteria were ADHF, over 18 years old, with a “warm-wet” clinical profile. POCUS was performed using an ultraportable device using LUS and PVP. Statistical analysis used logistic regression models to estimate the association between ultrasound congestion and outcomes. Results: A total of 100 patients were included. The population was mostly female, with a median age of 78 years; 59% were hypertensive, and 39% had type 2 diabetes. Median NT-ProBNP was 3878 pg/ml. At discharge, 55% of patient had an inferior vena cava (IVC) over 2 cm, 54% had interstitial syndrome, and 41% had PVP >30%. Regarding 30-day readmission, we found an odds ratio (OR) 7.22 (95% CI 2.7-19.3) for interstitial syndrome; for PVP >30%, an OR 24.61 (95% CI 7.7-78.1) and an OR 13.19 (95% CI 2.7-62.6) for composite of residual congestion. Conclusion: Patients with ADHF and sub-clinical congestion, evidenced in LUS and PVP, were more likely to have readmission within 30 days of discharge. These findings should be confirmed with clinical trials to assess the effectiveness of a POCUS-guided treatment.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.009

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.329
Teacher spread0.316 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations9
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePOCUS JournalSame topicUltrasound in Clinical ApplicationsFrench-language works237,207