MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4404420747 · doi:10.1016/j.urbmob.2024.100094

Contrasting Stakeholders’ Perspectives on the First Full-Year School Street Initiatives in Ontario, Canada

2024· article· en· W4404420747 on OpenAlexafffundabout
Patricia Collins, Carise Thompson, Makenna Humes, Katherine L. Frohlich

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Urban Mobility · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicUrban, Neighborhood, and Segregation Studies
Canadian institutionsUniversité de MontréalQueen's University
FundersCanadian Institutes of Health Research
KeywordsEnvironmental planningGeographyPolitical sciencePublic administrationSociology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

• A growing number of cities are experimenting with street closure interventions. • Support for or opposition to these interventions varies across stakeholders. • Parents and children commonly saw the need for and benefits of School Streets. • Motorists, whether as residents or parents, are less supportive of School Streets. • Implementation of these interventions requires attention to divergent perspectives. A growing number of municipalities in North America and globally are experimenting with various forms of street closure interventions to support non-motorists in reclaiming city streets as public spaces. While many interventions are episodic in nature, intensive interventions that operate daily for months or years are difficult to implement because they are more disruptive of the status quo and more likely to face opposition from influential stakeholders. The objective of this study was to capture and compare the perspectives of three distinct stakeholders – residents, parents, and children – regarding school street interventions that operated daily from September to June in two neighbourhoods in a mid-sized Canadian city. Resident and parent perspectives were captured using anonymous online surveys, while child perspectives were captured using focus groups. Children and parents from both neighbourhoods perceived a need for the intervention to eliminate the hazards posed by vehicular congestion around the school entrance. Both groups reported that the intervention increased safety for children as they come and go from school each day. Residents were less convinced that the intervention was necessary and reported increased congestion on neighbouring streets. There were notable differences in residents’ perspectives between the two neighbourhoods regarding perceived changes in safety and in their experiences of the interventions, which are likely attributable to differences in built form and pre-existing traffic patterns in each neighbourhood. Motorists, whether as parents or residents, were much less likely to observe the intervention as beneficial and pleasant, and more likely to report observing problems with how it operated. These findings offer critical insights for policy and practice for street closure interventions, including having an effective strategy for traffic management to minimize opposition, the value of pilot testing to build support, and centering children's needs and voices in efforts to reclaim streets as public space.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.250
Threshold uncertainty score0.799

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.059
GPT teacher head0.273
Teacher spread0.214 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2024
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Urban MobilitySame topicUrban, Neighborhood, and Segregation StudiesFrench-language works237,207