Diseño regulatorio e interacciones de gobernanza en la responsabilidad social impulsada por los trabajadores. Acuerdo de Dindigul
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Resumen En este artículo se investiga el auge de las iniciativas de responsabilidad social impulsada por los trabajadores (RST) para combatir los abusos laborales y la vulneración de los derechos humanos en las cadenas mundiales de suministro. Se analiza el Acuerdo de Dindigul, un caso pionero de RST impulsado por un sindicato independiente de mayoría dalit dirigido por mujeres en Dindigul (India) para abordar la violencia por razón de género en las cadenas de suministro de la confección. Mediante entrevistas con informadores clave y análisis documental codificado en NVivo 12, se estudia la génesis del Acuerdo de Dindigul, su singularidad y sus interacciones con otros instrumentos de gobernanza.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.005 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".