La investigación Biográfico-Narrativo, una alternativa para el estudio de los docentes
Bibliographic record
Abstract
En el presente ensayo, hacemos un recuento de la investigación biográfico-narrativa como metodología en el campo educativo y, específicamente, para el estudio de los docentes. En primer lugar, se describen de sus orígenes, la terminología más utilizada en este campo, los ámbitos de aplicación en educación, los medios sociales, los objetos teóricos estudiados y los instrumentos para la recolección de datos biográficos. Así mismo cómo se ha desarrollado esta metodología en diferentes países. También se hace una reseña del enfoque biográfico-narrativa: cómo ha sido utilizada en diversas investigaciones en el estudio del desarrollo de la carrera docente en los diferentes niveles educativos. Se enfatizará en los países que han tenido una larga tradición en la utilización de este enfoque: en Estados Unidos, Canadá y los países europeos, ya que, en el caso mexicano, esta metodología no ha tenido mucha presencia en el ámbito educativo y menos en el estudio de los docentes; por lo que, el propósito de este documento es presentar el desarrollo de este método: las fuentes, los campos de aplicación e instrumentos para realizar estudios en educación.This essay discusses the narrative-biographic approach as a methodology in the educational field, specifically for the study of the teachers. First, its origins, the terminology in the field, the application for education, the social media, the theoretically studied objects and instruments for gathering biographical data are described. Also how this methodology has been developed in different countries. Additionally, a description of the narrative-biographic approach is presented: how it has been used in various researches in the study of the development of the teaching career at different educational levels. Emphasis on the countries that have had a long tradition in using this approach: United States, Canada and European countries, this because the methodology exposed has not had much application in the field of education and less in the study of teachers in Mexico therefore the purpose of this document is to present the development of this method: fields of application and instruments to carry out studies in education.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.006 | 0.008 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.003 | 0.003 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.007 | 0.021 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.012 | 0.008 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.006 |
| Research integrity | 0.003 | 0.005 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.007 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".