MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Enhanced cross-dataset electroencephalogram-based emotion recognition using unsupervised domain adaptation

2024· article· en· W4404431930 on OpenAlex
Md Niaz Imtiaz, Naimul Khan

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.

Bibliographic record

VenueComputers in Biology and Medicine · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPsychology
TopicEmotion and Mood Recognition
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsEmotion recognitionComputer scienceDomain adaptationElectroencephalographyPattern recognition (psychology)Adaptation (eye)Artificial intelligenceDomain (mathematical analysis)Unsupervised learningSpeech recognitionMachine learningPsychologyNeuroscienceMathematics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Emotion recognition holds great promise in healthcare and in the development of affect-sensitive systems such as brain-computer interfaces (BCIs). However, the high cost of labeled data and significant differences in electroencephalogram (EEG) signals among individuals limit the cross-domain application of EEG-based emotion recognition models. Addressing cross-dataset scenarios poses greater challenges due to changes in subject demographics, recording devices, and stimuli presented. To tackle these challenges, we propose an improved method for classifying EEG-based emotions across domains with different distributions. We propose a Gradual Proximity-guided Target Data Selection (GPTDS) technique, which gradually selects reliable target domain samples for training based on their proximity to the source clusters and the model's confidence in predicting them. This approach avoids negative transfer caused by diverse and unreliable samples. Additionally, we introduce a cost-effective test-time augmentation (TTA) technique named Prediction Confidence-aware Test-Time Augmentation (PC-TTA). Traditional TTA methods often face substantial computational burden, limiting their practical utility. By applying TTA only when necessary, based on the model's predictive confidence, our approach improves the model's performance during inference while minimizing computational costs compared to traditional TTA approaches. Experiments on the DEAP and SEED datasets demonstrate that our method outperforms state-of-the-art approaches, achieving accuracies of 67.44% when trained on DEAP and tested on SEED, and 59.68% vice versa, with improvements of 7.09% and 6.07% over the baseline. It excels in detecting both positive and negative emotions, highlighting its effectiveness for practical emotion recognition in healthcare applications. Moreover, our proposed PC-TTA technique reduces computational time by a factor of 15 compared to traditional full TTA approaches.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Other design · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.900
Threshold uncertainty score0.492

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.060
GPT teacher head0.393
Teacher spread0.332 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it