MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4404435770 · doi:10.1029/2024ja033226

The Curvature of TEC as a Proxy for Ionospheric Amplitude Scintillation

2024· article· en· W4404435770 on OpenAlexaffabout
K. Meziane, A. M. Hamza, P. T. Jayachandran

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Geophysical Research Space Physics · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicIonosphere and magnetosphere dynamics
Canadian institutionsUniversity of New Brunswick
Fundersnot available
KeywordsTECIonosphereScintillationAmplitudeInterplanetary scintillationCurvatureGeologyGeodesyGeophysicsPhysicsOpticsMathematicsGeometryNuclear physicsPlasma

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Fluctuations in the ionospheric electron density cause distortions in the Global Navigation Satellite Systems (GNSS) signals recorded on the ground. The examination of these distortions reveal some of the physical conditions under which the electron density fluctuations develop as well as their physical characteristics. Several studies have investigated the correlation between the rate of change of the total electron content and amplitude and phase scintillation indices and , respectively. These studies stipulate that could be used as a proxy for scintillation indices. The link between the scintillation indices and the variations in is investigated both theoretically and empirically. Our study shows that the second derivative (the Laplacian) of the provides a better diagnosis of the nature of the interaction of trans‐ionospheric radio signals with ionospheric irregularities. In the refractive case, the second derivative of fluctuations vanishes. In the diffractive limit, we show that the amplitude scintillation index and the standard deviation of the second derivative of are linearly dependent. The theoretical results are empirically validated with measurements of GNSS radio signals propagating through the auroral ionospheric region and recorded by ground receivers of the Canadian High Arctic Ionospheric Network (CHAIN). The present study suggests that the use of as a proxy for scintillation occurring in the polar and auroral regions must be taken with caution.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.006

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.019
GPT teacher head0.348
Teacher spread0.329 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2024
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Geophysical Research Space PhysicsSame topicIonosphere and magnetosphere dynamicsFrench-language works237,207