MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4404443559 · doi:10.1353/phx.2023.a942859

Re-Echoing Hylas: Dracontius’ Myth and the Classical Tradition

2023· article· fr· W4404443559 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Sophia Papaioannou

Bibliographic record

VenuePhoenix · 2023
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicClassical Antiquity Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMythologyPhilosophyLiteratureClassical traditionArt

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract: Hylas, the protagonist in a para-narrative of the Argonautic journey, is a hero who embodies a transformed epic heroism and a new poetic aesthetics in the Hellenistic era and who was a subject of particular fascination in the Latin literary tradition. Dracontius, at the end of the classical era, revisits the Hylas myth as he consciously engages with the poetics of change and narrative fluidity. Hylas, le protagoniste d’un récit parallèle au voyage des Argonautes, est un héros qui incarne un héroïsme épique transformé et une esthétique poétique nouvelle à la période hellénistique ; il faisait également l’objet d’une fascination toute particulière de la part de la tradition littéraire latine. À la fin de la période classique, Dracontius revisite le mythe d’Hylas en y alliant poétique du changement et fluidité de la narration.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesScience and technology studies
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.807
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.003
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.048
GPT teacher head0.310
Teacher spread0.263 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePhoenixSame topicClassical Antiquity StudiesFrench-language works237,207